The business of standing thoroughbred stallions

Words - Alysen Miller

Foals gambol in 750 acres of lush green paddocks enlaced by pristine post and rail fencing while the sun glints off the chalky New Forest hills. It’s the sort of timeless vista that could have dripped straight from the brush of George Stubbs. But the bucolic scene belies the harsh reality that the small breeder in Britain is heading towards extinction. “We’re under so much pressure here. On the bad days, sometimes it is tempting to say, ‘Sod it,’” says Ed Harper, director of Whitsbury Manor Stud. “But I have a responsibility to the staff that have been with us for a long time and to my dad, who worked 50 years for this. I don’t want him to see us raise the white flag just yet, so we’re digging our heels in.”

Pressure is, after all, something the denizens of Whitsbury Manor are accustomed to. Harper’s father purchased the farm in the 1980s, having previously managed it for his uncle—the colourful bookmaker William Hill who died of a heart attack while attending the October Sales at Newmarket in 1971. A non-horsey child (“I couldn’t even put a headcollar on”), Harper briefly entertained a career in chartered surveying before the siren call of the breeding shed proved too strong. 

Since taking over the reins from his father, Harper has had to get creative in order to keep the bank manager at bay. “I believe that there are different reasons for doing things,” he explains. “I’m very pleased if very rich people want to spend money in our sport and don’t have to make it pay. The more the merrier. But we’ve never been able to do that. My father had to borrow money to buy Whitsbury Manor, and we’ve never been out of debt since. Our choice is not whether to be ultra-commercial or to do it their way. Our choice is to be ultra-commercial or not be in business at all.” He currently stands four stallions at Whitsbury Manor. He has also partnered with the National Stud to stand Lope Y Fernandez in Newmarket. “I think it was a perfect mix of us being very familiar with how to make commercial decisions, and them having the branding and the location,” he explains. “Hopefully Lope Y Fernandez is the start of a really good relationship that can benefit breeders.” But Whitsbury Manor’s flag bearer is undoubtedly Showcasing. After an inauspicious start, “we literally covered a couple of polo ponies with him in years two and three. We were dealing down to £2,500,” Harper says. Showcasing — the son of Oasis Dream — is fast establishing himself as a formidable sire. Currently standing for £45,000, his dance card is full for the current breeding season.

Showcasing’s success has allowed Harper to keep his head above water a little longer. “I think if Showcasing hadn’t come along when he did, we might have 10 mares here and no stallions; and I’d be doing all the mucking out,” he says. But ironically, it has risked pricing out the smaller breeders on whom studs like Whitsbury Manor traditionally rely. “We were dealing regularly with people that would breed one foal every other year, and we were delighted that they were coming to us,” Harper explains. “So it’s a delicate balance.” Harper is aware that in order to survive in the long term, he needs to cater to the smaller breeders as well as those who can afford a £45,000 nomination. “Very much at the front of our minds is that we have to keep the critical mass of breeders alive and breeding,” he says. “They need to have options. When they stop getting the options, they stop.” 

Harper’s fears are borne out by the statistics. At one end of the breeding spectrum lies a handful of large operations, many of which have more than 100 broodmares. But the industry also includes around 2,500 small breeders with just one or two broodmares, who operate on a recreational rather than commercial basis. These small breeders account for around a third of the British foal crop each year and so are fundamental to both the breeding and wider racing industries. But the number of small breeders decreased by 5% between 2013 and 2017, according to a 2018 Thoroughbred Breeders’ Association report (the latest year for which figures are available). Of those remaining, 66% were operating at a loss—up from 45% in 2013. It seems certain that if the current trajectory continues, even more small- to medium-sized operators will be forced out of the industry over the coming years. Harper is clear-eyed about what that means for the prospects of operations like his: “We don’t survive unless our clients survive,” he says. “However good our stallions are, if we don’t have clients, no one will know it, and vice versa. They need the opportunities to have stallions they can afford. It goes hand in hand. One can’t do it without the other.”

Of course, nobody ever said that breeding racehorses was easy. “It’s always challenging, even at the best of times, because there are variables that you have no control over,” says Pope McLean, Jr, business manager and co-owner of Crestwood Farm. Some 3,900 miles away in Kentucky, USA, McLean echoes many of Harper’s concerns: “We’re all trying to come up with a good horse that can carry the burden of what we do,” he says. “There are operators that are much smaller than we are who are struggling,” he acknowledges. Founded by Pope McLean père in the 1970s, the McLean family has owned and operated the 1,000-acre facility ever since.

But farms like Crestwood Farm have had to come up with some clever initiatives to support their stallions and the wider breeding industry. This has included jumping on the Share the Upside bandwagon. Originated by the aptly-named Spendthrift Farm in Kentucky, the simple yet innovative concept was originally designed to get more mares for Into Mischief who, in 2010, was entering his second year at stud, and another Spendthrift stallion, Notional. For an initial commitment of $13,000 over two years, breeders could obtain a lifetime breeding right in the stallion. Although met with scepticism from the market at first, both Into Mischief and the Share the Upside programme are now both firm fixtures on the American breeding landscape. “It’s something that’s tangible that can help the smaller breeder,” says McLean. “A lot of farms probably aren’t too keen on it, but I think it’s only fair. You have to have the breeders to move forward. If the stallion becomes successful and the breeders have helped you get there, that’s one way that you can reward them for helping you.”

The Share the Upside scheme has been a lifeline for smaller breeders in the states. Back in the UK, meanwhile, incentive schemes such as the Great British Bonus have started to improve return on investment for domestic breeders, although the potential upside is modest by comparison.

But it is not just a lack of flashy incentives that is driving smaller breeders out of business. The dominance of a handful of powerful owner-breeders means that only around 10% of the 4,000-odd foals born in Great Britain each year are bred primarily for sale, with the result that a dwindling number of breeders must walk an increasingly taut supply-and-demand tightrope. The polarisation between the haves and the have nots is stark. 

According to historical data from the Thoroughbred Breeders’ Association report, the average filly sold at the Tattersalls Book 1 sale earned an estimated profit of £118,000. Those sold at Book 3 made an average loss of £23,500. “I suppose that’s the main difference between your market and our market,” says Sam Matthews, general manager of Swettenham Stud in Victoria, Australia. “A lot of the top-end horses—the Dubawis and Galileos of the world—might not have a huge amount of their progeny offered to the trainers and other people in the industry, whereas almost every horse that is bred [in Australia] is offered for sale in some way, shape or form whether offered as a weanling, syndicated privately or offered as a yearling. If a large farm is breeding 100 mares a year, at least 80 of them would likely be offered to the public.” This helps keep supply and demand for stallion services elastic: “It’s almost a year-by-year prospect,” says Matthews. “Certainly, if a horse becomes proven quite early on in their career, they do escalate to the increased service fees quite quickly. But on the flip side, if you don’t have much success, they do drop back quite quickly.”

The effect of a buoyant sales culture means that smaller breeders can still make a profit in an open marketplace: “From our point of view, the smaller breeders are the backbone of what we’re all doing,” explains Matthews. “If somebody can get a return off a $20,000 service fee and get $150,000 for their yearling or weanling, that’s an incredible result and that’s something that we hope to be able to help them to achieve.” It’s all about catering to the market. “There’s not much point in having a Bentley dealership in a low socio-economic area,” says Matthews.

By comparison, the UK racing and breeding industry can appear to be something of an ouroboros. Only six of this year’s Derby field had been through the sales ring at some point in their lives (including an honourable mention for the £3,000-yearling Glory Daze). Frankel and Galileo were responsible for five runners between them. Before Desert Crown’s win in this year’s Derby, you would have had to go back to 2017 to find the last winner of the Epsom Classic that was not bred by Godolphin or Coolmore or one of their affiliates. (Wings Of Eagles, bred in France but snapped up as a yearling for €220,000 by MV Magnier at the Arqana August Yearling Sale. He now stands at stud for Coolmore.) 

Back in Hampshire, Harper is clear that he does not believe that the big owner/breeders themselves are the problem: “They’re bringing investment in,” he explains. “[The big operators] want competition. They want to do well, but they also are racing enthusiasts at heart. People soon realise that three-runner races where they’ve got two out of the three runners is not good for anybody.” Like many smaller operations, Harper has adopted an ‘if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em’ approach. Of Whitsbury Manor’s four stallions, two—Sergei Prokofiev and Due Diligence—are operated in partnership with Coolmore.

But the consequences of the concentration of power in the hands of a small handful of owner/breeders are not only economic, but genetic. “We’re going down a black hole, genetically,” cautions Harper. “It’s very unwise.” Harper is putting his money where his mouth is: Between Sergei Prokofiev and Due Diligence, Harper reckons he has the highest concentration of AP Indy blood in his corner of the UK. “I’m a big fan of AP Indy blood,” he explains. “That hard knocking tenacity and toughness—the pedigree purists love to throw knives at us, but what they don’t realise is that we’re keeping the bottom half alive. I think it’s important we keep refreshing the genetics in Europe. I’m chuffed that we’re bringing those genes over for people to use. It’s characteristic of breeding in every country that people cherish what’s on their doorstep more than they look over the fence. But I try and have a more global look.” And then there is the pressure to produce early developing horses that trainers can sell: “They’re our shop window, and we’ll do our best to produce what they can sell. There’s no point in producing horses that the trainers are going to struggle to sell to their clients,” says Harper. “The new client is probably shared ownership, and they want instant action. We need to be producing horses that the trainer can sell and say, ‘Hey, look, lads: if you buy this horse, we could be at Royal Ascot in a couple of months’ time.’”

So what is the solution? It is clear that, in the wake of the double whammy of Brexit and COVID-19, the economic situation is more precarious than ever. While the largest operations are probably too big to fail, a swingeing recession could force even more small- and medium-sized breeders to cease their operations for good. In such a scenario, British racing is facing the very real prospect that it will not be able to sustain its racing calendar. Around 20,000 individual runners are needed to maintain the programme, according to the Thoroughbred Breeders’ Association. With fewer races meeting the eight runners per race required for each way betting, the quality of the betting product will deteriorate, along with funding from the gambling industry and media rights payments; and the finances of all racing industry participants will be severely impacted.

Harper is pessimistic about his chances of being able to hand over Whitsbury Manor to the next generation. “I don’t think we will have the client base of small breeders to give our stallions a chance to compete in 25 years’ time if we keep going down this road,” he says. “Our goal is survival. And we don’t survive in this business without our clients. I’ve seen so many breeders stop breeding in this country. Not every foal we produce will make money. But if we can, we will continue to source stallions that we are able to stand at a fee that will give our small-breeding clients an opportunity. Because if we’re not solving that equation and they don’t have options, they stop breeding.”

Gerald Leigh Memorial Lectures 2022




The 6th Annual Gerald Leigh Memorial Lectures were held at Tattersalls on Tuesday, 7th June and this year focused on Thoroughbred Reproductive Efficiency. The lectures were aimed at all those involved in breeding racehorses and were supported by the Gerald Leigh Trust in honour of Mr Leigh's passion for the Thoroughbred horse and its health and welfare. 

There were six lectures in total from four internationally recognised experts in their field with two discussions on mare and stallion fertility.

ACCESS ALL LECTURES FROM THIS LINK

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeWFdwB7poOQLBHXKlsdnQA/videos



Reproductive strategies of stallions and mares

The morning session was kicked off by Dr Dominki Burger, a professor at the Swiss Institute of Equine Medicine, talking about his fascinating research on both mare and stallion reproductive behaviour and how social signalling affects reproductive strategies of stallions and mares.

“Breeding of horses in feral herds differs significantly from breeding under domestic conditions. The traditional concept of the equine breeding industry is to keep stallions and mares spatially separated which can lead to significant behavioural as well as fertility problems in both stallions and mares. Our studies demonstrate that the social environment of horses significantly influences their individual reproductive strategies. The perception of this social environment is influenced by various factors, including age and size-related traits or odours that reveal the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). The MHC is a group of immune genes that has been found to influence olfactory communication and reproductive strategies in various vertebrates.”




Social signalling and its effect on mare reproduction

In mares, Dr Burger’s research group has shown that mares exposed to a stallion ovulate earlier in the breeding season than mares without male stimulation, and that when in season, mares show consistent preferences towards certain stallions. It is thought that the MHC or linked genes may influence equine female mate choice in a similar manner to previous observations in humans and other species. MHC-dissimilar mares and stallions have been shown to be more compatible and in fact, close proximity to a stallion with similar-MHC at the time of fertilisation; and early gestation can have a negative effect on pregnancy rates even when bred to an MHC-dissimilar stallion. The same group also showed that oxytocin levels have been shown to be significantly elevated in response to teasing, and multiple periovulatory inseminations potentially lead to an increase in fertility results per cycle, without causing increased inflammatory uterine reactions in healthy, fertile females. 




Social signalling and its effect on stallion reproduction

In stallions, they found that the MHC-linked signals influence testosterone secretion and ejaculate characteristics, both indicators of male reproductive strategies. Higher testosterone levels and higher sperm numbers were recorded in ejaculates from males exposed to MHC-dissimilar mares than when kept close to MHC-similar mares. 




How management strategies can increase reproductive efficiency

Dr Burger concluded firstly that exposing transitional mares to the proximity of a stallion is an easy and safe alternative to, for example, light programs or elaborated hormonal therapies, to start the breeding season earlier and to increase the number of oestrous cycles and possible matings in horses. Secondly, that optimal MHC-linked social signalling around the time of breeding has an effect of cryptic female mate choice and hence leads to better pregnancy results. Thirdly, optimal housing social conditions including the use of MHC-linked social signalling promises potential optimisations regarding sexual behaviour and semen output of stallions, and that introducing optimal MHC-linked social signalling around the time of breeding can lead to an increase of semen quantity and quality in the stallions’ ejaculates. 

Applying these new and practicable options in the field may result in improved management and well-being of both breeding stallions and mares as well as a more desirable economic situation for breeders.




Stallion fertility and reproductive efficiency

The second speaker of the day was Dr Charles Love, a professor in the Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences at Texas A&M. Dr Love is a world-renowned stallion expert and internationally recognised for his extensive and ground-breaking research in stallion fertility. He spoke on his work on record analysis systems for critically studying stallion fertility and ways in which we can improve stallion reproductive efficiency.  

“There are many factors to evaluate in addition to the seasonal pregnancy rate and per cycle pregnancy rate. The breeding season (mid-February through the end of June) is a dynamic period such that the conditions (type of mare bred [barren, maiden, foaling], number of mares bred) vary considerably throughout the breeding season. For instance, a stallion’s fertility may decline in the middle of the breeding season when the number of mares he breeds increases, while early in the season he may do well. In contrast, stallions may do poorly early in the breeding season due to reproductively poor-quality barren mares, then improve once they start breeding foaling mares. The fertility of thoroughbred stallions may be affected by the cover (1-4) on which a mare was bred. A mare bred on a later cover (2-4) may receive fewer sperm than the mare on the first cover, therefore, evaluating the effect of cover can provide insight into a stallion’s fertility.”




The importance of monitoring testicular size

Evaluation of testes size and function is a fundamental part of the breeding soundness evaluation and in particular insurance examinations for first-season stallion infertility. The evaluation of sexually immature stallions that have recently retired from racing is challenging, because this can be a very dynamic period for testes growth due to the stress of racing as well as the immaturity of the stallion. Testes size can be measured by ultrasonography, and a volume measure can be attached to each testis. This provides an objective measure of the testes for all the parties involved and identifies those testes that are clearly very small and unlikely to produce sperm at the time of the evaluation. Measurements of the testes also allow the practitioner to re-evaluate a suspect stallion at a later stage to determine if the size is changing.




A common cause of stallion subfertility

Dr Love spoke about one of the most common conditions of the stallion, plugged ampullae or sperm accumulation. “This condition results when sperm back-up in the ampullae (an accessory gland located in the pelvis) and become non-viable (dead). The condition usually occurs in stallions with large testes (they produce more sperm) that have not bred since the end of the previous breeding season. Depending on the severity of the condition, the clean-out period, which requires frequent ejaculation to remove the accumulated sperm, can take from days to weeks. If stallions are bred during this time, subfertility may result because of the deposition of poor-quality sperm into the mare. Semen collection prior to the breeding season will help identify these stallions so they can be cleaned out before the start of the breeding season.”




Does reinforcement breeding improve fertility?

Reinforcement breeding occurs when a stallion finishes his cover, dismounts, and the “dripping” from the penis are collected into a container, mixed with semen extender and then passed (reinforced) into the uterus of the mare that the stallion just covered. Opinions vary as to how often this procedure should be applied (to select mares and stallions, only select covers, or all covers). One factor that plays a role is simply the number of sperm that are recovered in the dismount. The more sperm in the dismount sample, the fewer remain in the mare; thus, unless the dismount sample is reinforced, the mare may not receive an adequate “dose” of sperm. A study from Texas A&M University found that when >200 million sperm were reinforced, fertility increased almost 12% in those mares that were reinforced. Other factors that may affect the decision to reinforce include stallions that are physically limited (e.g., hindlimb/back pain, size disproportion [tall mare, short stallion]), resulting in a premature dismount and sperm deposited in the vagina or even outside the mare rather than the uterus.




Management of the barren mare for optimal fertility

Moving on to the mare, Dr Karen Wolfsdorf—a partner at Hagyard Equine Medical Institute Kentucky—gave the first talk on management of the barren mare for optimal fertility. Karen explained that “a broodmare needs to produce six foals every seven years and consistently produce viable foals to be economically successful. In order to achieve this, the mare needs to be in good physical condition, have regular oestrous cycles, mate, conceive, maintain pregnancy, give birth and raise a foal. If there is a breakdown in any of these areas, she will become considered a “problem” mare. Consideration of breeding practices and fertility of the stallion is important before all the blame of subfertility is placed on the mare. Therefore, to manage the mare appropriately, a complete reproductive examination is imperative in order to identify the potential cause of the mare’s infertility. Once this has been determined, specific therapy can be initiated. Practising appropriate breeding techniques, considering the mare’s inadequacy and then providing post-breeding treatments can aid in optimising pregnancy rates.”




Investigating the problem mare

As with any investigation, taking a thorough history of the past reproductive performance of the mare is essential. This includes age, breed, past and present reproductive status, cycling patterns, previous uterine infections and treatment, hormonal use, foaling problems, abortions and surgery.

Clinical evaluation of the mare starts by external examination. Good body condition and perineal conformation are essential for good fertility. Mares with extreme weight loss or obesity (equine metabolic or Cushing’s disease) have poor reproduction performance. The mare’s reproductive tract is composed of the vulva, vestibule, vagina, cervix, uterus, oviducts and ovaries. All work together to provide the most conducive environment for embryonic development and the birth of a healthy foal. The reproductive tract resides in the caudal portion of the body suspended from the body wall by the broad ligaments. As the number of oestrous cycles and foals produced increases, so does the laxity of these ligaments causing the reproductive tract to lie more cranial and ventral to the pelvis. Three major anatomical barriers protect the uterine environment. These include the vulva labia, vulvovaginal fold (hymen) and the cervix. Failure or compromise of these barriers leads to contamination by particulate matter, pneumovagina (sucking air in the vagina), cervicitis/vaginitis and endometritis. Perineal conformation involves the anatomic relationship between the vulva and anus. The presence of abnormalities and the degree of angular change may predispose to pneumovagina or urine pooling.  Several surgical procedures to correct abnormal perineal conformation have been described to include Caslick vulvoplasty and different types of perineal body reconstruction (vestibuloplasty, Gadd and Pouret’s technique).




Palpation of the entire ovarian surface assesses size, consistency, follicular activity and the presence of an ovulation fossa. Small ovaries with little or no follicular activity as in anestrous, transition or genetic abnormalities can be differentiated from normal follicular activity.  Normal ovarian consistency can be distinguished from large firm ovaries, which may be cystic in appearance related to ovarian haematomas or tumours. Examination of the uterus allows size, tone and location in the abdomen to be determined. Identifying the presence and amount of endometrial oedema as well as intra-luminal abnormalities such as fluid, hyperechogenicities, endometrial cysts or masses are also important in trying to differentiate the presence of inflammation versus other causes of infertility. Palpation and measurement ultrasonographically of the cervix allows direct correlation of length and width to stage of the oestrous cycle and pregnancy. Cervical tears must be definitively evaluated manually and during dioestrus when the cervix is closed. 




Uterine culture and cytology are useful tools in the diagnosis of endometrial inflammation and an indicator of bacterial endometritis. Bacteriological (culture) and cytological results obtained by endometrial biopsy are the most sensitive indicators bearing positive predictive value (a positive result is indicative of endometritis) compared to results obtained by endometrial swab. The use of low-volume lavage is a fast and accurate method to obtain endometrial samples for identification of mares with chronic or subclinical endometritis. 




Endometrial biopsies can be indicated in barren mares, repeat breeders, early embryonic death or abortion, pyometra and mucometra, genital surgery and fertility evaluation. They provide an endometrial biopsy score which is an accepted maker of uterine health and predicted fertility.  The endometrium is classified according to the presence of inflammation (type and severity), endometrial gland density, peri-glandular fibrosis and nesting, cystic glandular distension, lymphatic lacunae and angiopathies or angiosclerotic changes. As the number and severity of pathologies increase, so does the category classification and thus decreasing the potential of carrying a foal to term. Hysteroscopy (direct visualisation of the uterus) is a valuable tool when uterine abnormalities need further investigation or the cause of infertility cannot be determined by other diagnostic procedures. 




Endometritis: a leading cause of subfertility in the mare

One of the most commonly identified problems is inflammation of the uterus or endometritis. This can be caused by acute or chronic infections or persistent mating induced endometritis (PMIE).  The most common aetiological agents found to cause uterine infections are Streptococcus zooepidemicus and Escherichia coli as the result of faecal and genital flora contamination. Mares that fail to clear the uterus of bacteria are classified as susceptible to chronic infection and are believed to have a compromised uterine defence system. This is usually identified by the presence of intraluminal fluid on ultrasound for an excessive period of time. Chronic endometritis is a major cause of equine infertility in older and multiparous mares. Normal mares are able to clear their uterus of bacteria with their uterine defence mechanisms, inflammatory response, uterine contraction and lymphatic drainage. In susceptible mares when bacteria infiltrate and contaminate the uterus, a persistent or chronic endometritis persists. In addition, some bacteria are able to utilise methods to survive degradation by the host immune system and antibiotic therapy.  




Mares with chronic infectious endometritis will be treated with conventional methods such as appropriate antimicrobials (determined by culture and sensitivity) as well as uterine lavage, oxytocin and cloprostenol to assist the uterus to physically clear contaminants and inflammatory products.  Most importantly, correction of perineal conformation and the breakdown of external barriers by Caslick’s vulvoplasty or cervical repair is imperative. With the recognition of increased production of mucus with inflammation and the identification of biofilms, emphasis on treatment has become focused on new alternative therapies that can potentiate the effectiveness of antimicrobials. BActivate has recently been described as aiding clearance of dormant B. strep, allowing for identification and enhanced antibiotic therapy and treatment. Treatment is usually systemic for 10–14 days as well as intrauterine during oestrus. Chemical curettage with kerosene has been demonstrated to produce glandular activation in mares, with improved conception rates in treated versus control mares as biopsy grades increased from I to III.  

After identifying and resolving the cause of infertility, specific breeding strategies should be considered. A problem mare should be bred once within the oestrus period so inflammation is kept to a minimum.  




Modulating the mare’s immune response in cases of PMIE

Most therapies in the past for PMIE have been directed at aiding uterine contractions and uterine clearance; however, as more research is directed toward the abnormal immune response of susceptible mares, new therapeutics are starting to address the modulation of the inflammatory response.  

A significant improvement of pregnancy rates was observed when prednisolone acetate was administered to mares with a history of PMIE. When dexamethasone was administered within one hour of breeding in combination with traditional post-breeding therapies, mares with a history of fluid accumulation had increased pregnancy rates when three or more risk factors for susceptibility to endometritis were identified. 

Enhancement of cell-mediated immunity by a cell-wall extract of Mycobacterium phlei intrauterine or IV (Settle; Bioniche Animal Health - Bogard, Georgia) or Proprionibacterium acnes IV (EqStime; Neogen Corp - Lexington, Kentucky) also aid in clearance of inflammation experimentally and clinically increased pregnancy rates respectively. 

Intrauterine autologous plasma has been used to aid the immune response post-mating to clear spermatozoa and bacteria. More recently treatment with platelet rich plasma (PrP) has been shown to reduce the inflammatory response and improve pregnancy rates after breeding particularly in mares susceptible to endometritis.  

Biological treatments, such as autologous conditioned serum (ACS) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been used in human and veterinary medicine for immunomodulation for over 10 years. Additional studies need to determine the effects of MSCs on problem mares affected by PMIE. 

Dr Wolfsdorf concluded that in order to manage the “problem” mare we first need to determine the cause of her problem.  Specific treatments have been illustrated for varying diseases however it is important to remember for best results or pregnancy it is imperative to have a non-infected, un-inflamed uterine environment into which the semen is deposited.

Managing the high-risk pregnancy

Dr Wolfsdorf’s second talk was on managing the high-risk pregnancy. A recent report estimated that the proportion of annual lost pregnancies in Thoroughbred mares ranges from 7.9% to 15.2% in the UK, Ireland and Kentucky. A recent study showed that the most common causes of pregnancy loss worldwide from 1960–2020 include EHV-1, placentitis, leptospirosis, twinning, congenital abnormalities, EHV-4, umbilical cord torsion and equine amnionitis/mare reproductive loss syndrome. When a mare becomes stressed, debilitated or her reproductive tract is compromised, inflammatory cytokines initiate prostaglandin release which can induce abnormal uterine irritability and potential pregnancy loss. Reproductive problems that arise during gestation, when diagnosed early and treated appropriately, can be overcome; and foetal viability increases, producing a live foal. 





Transrectal ultrasound monitoring

In mares that are considered to be high-risk for pregnancy loss, monitoring of the uterus, placenta and foetus by screening monthly with transrectal and transabdominal ultrasonography is a viable method for detecting abnormalities early. Foetal presentation, combined utero-placental thickness at the cervical star and orbital diameter and blood flow of foetuses in anterior presentation can be assessed. Normal values for the utero-placental thickness at 271–300, 301–330, and >330 days of gestation are <8, <10 and <12 mm respectively. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of foetal fluids can be monitored by trans-rectal ultrasonography. Fluids that have increased echo density are likely to have increased cellularity due to infection or inflammation and therefore should be noted. Increased foetal movement can also falsely increase cellularity of the fluid at that period of time due to the stirring affect. Integrity of the utero-placental unit at the cervical star region can also be monitored, helping to identify opening of the cervix, placental separation, placental or uterine oedema or the presence of exudate. Since ascending placentitis is one of the most common abnormalities identified, examination of this area is imperative.




Transabdominal ultrasound monitoring

Transabdominal ultrasonography is extremely useful in evaluating for multiple foetuses, foetal growth, activity, mobility, presentation, viability as well as placental abnormalities and foetal fluid volume and echogenicity. Normal values for heart rate and rhythm, foetal activity, size, stomach measurements, cervical pole and foetal fluid depth have been determined and therefore comparisons can be made. The foetal presentation can be identified by finding the ribs and thorax usually midline and cranial to the mammary gland.  Foetal heart rates can vary depending on activity, ranging from 70–100bpm with consistently low or high heart rates indicative of foetal stress or distress. Identification and examination of the umbilical cord can sometimes be assessed, depending on positioning of the foetus. It is important to always examine both sides of the abdomen completely to eliminate the possibility of twins (a differential for premature mammary gland development). Foetal activity and tone can be determined when monitoring heart rate and reaction to ultrasonography.





Biomarkers of foetal well-being

In the normal physiology of pregnancy, progesterone (P4) is synthesised by the ovaries until about 150 days of gestation. From then until 320–360 days, P5 is supplied by the foetus, which is converted into P4 by the placenta. During the second half of pregnancy, little if any P4 is present because it is rapidly metabolised into progestagens. These progestagens increase gradually during the last few weeks prior to parturition (>300 days) but decline within a few days or even hours of delivery. In the first trimester impending abortion is preceded by declining or low P4 levels. However, foetal losses or premature deliveries in late gestation, particularly those caused by placental abnormalities especially placentitis are associated with high concentrations of total progestagens. In mares where there was acute foetal distress (colic, uterine torsion) production of progestagens was dramatically reduced, indicating the importance of a healthy foetal-placental unit for progestagen formation.  




In general, the predominant oestrogens during pregnancy in mares in order of magnitude are oestrone, equilin, equilenin and oestradiol-17B. These hormones are produced by precursors from the foetus, metabolised by the placenta and act primarily on the maternal uterus. Measuring total serum oestrogens or more specifically estradiol-17B should help predict foetal viability and potentially help determine if therapy is successful.   Supplementing with oestrogens when total oestrogens are lower than normal is controversial at this time. Relaxin, a placental hormone, can be used as a biochemical marker of placental function and foetal well-being and as a predictor of pregnancy outcome in the horse. Serum Amyloid A has been identified to be increased in studies in which ascending placentitis has been induced. Unfortunately, this has not been translated into the farm situation in which subclinical placentitis or ultrasonographic changes are identified. In recent studies, pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines have been identified within the different compartments of the foetal placental unit and serum of the mare. Especially oestradiol 17B and IL-6 may be of interest when commercial testing is available and not too cost prohibitive. Further studies are needed to evaluate uterine blood flow in the compromised pregnancy as well as identify a potential “diagnostic panel” for pre-clinical placentitis specific for inflammation and for the placenta.  




Treating the high-risk pregnancy to improve outcomes

Treatment to help manage and support the high-risk pregnancy is directed at resolving the microbial invasion if present, inflammation, providing good or improved blood flow to the uterus, diminishing uterine contractility and improving viability of the foetus. Systemic treatment can include antimicrobials, exogenous progestagens, anti-inflammatories and rheostatic agents. If a mare has vaginal discharge and the cervix open, speculum examination and culture of the exudate yields identification and sensitivity of the organism and allows for appropriate local treatment. Specific antibiotics have been documented as crossing the placenta and achieving therapeutic values in the foetus and foetal fluids. Anti-inflammatories use consists of Flunixin Meglamine and Firocoxib. Administration of acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) improves uterine and ovarian perfusion and increases plasma progesterone concentration, but whether this results in increased uterine or placental perfusion remains to be determined. Extrapolation and use of pentoxifylline has also been utilised for similar reasons. 

Hopefully in the future, using a combination of these markers and techniques, the clinician will be able to identify abnormalities and initiate treatment early in the course of disease.”




Genetics of early pregnancy loss




Dr Mandi De Mestre, a reader in Reproductive Immunology from The Royal Veterinary College, London, spoke on her research into the genetics of early pregnancy loss. “Embryonic and foetal loss remain one of the greatest challenges in reproductive health with 5–10% of established day-15 pregnancies failing in the first two months. If they make it to two months, 5% of these pregnancies also fail to produce a viable foal. The underlying reason for these losses is variable, but ultimately most cases will be attributed to either a pathology of the mare (such as endometrial pathology, hormone function, aberrations in the immune response to pregnancy and egg characteristics) or the pregnancy itself (embryo/foetal-placental unit). Defects in the embryo can be derived from the stallion (sperm) or mare (eggs) or acquired during early embryonic development or in the case of abortion, later in pregnancy. In both cases, external factors such as pathogens, nutrients and environmental contaminants play a role, too. Whilst previous research has focused on factors that impact the environment in which the embryo develops, surprisingly little is known about defects of the embryo and foetus and how and why they occur. 




In early pregnancy, the most common reason for a pregnancy to fail is an abnormal number of chromosomes. When an embryo has either one extra or one less chromosome, the whole genome of the developing foal is disrupted which impacts critical events in early development. A number of outcomes can follow, ranging from loss of the embryo before it is even detected at two weeks post cover, to development of an embryo with no foetus, or development of a foetus with an abnormal cardiovascular or central nervous system incompatible with life. This condition can also be associated with abortion and stillbirth, but it is less common in later stages of pregnancy. Other genetic changes in the embryo such as single nucleotide polymorphisms and microdeletions are well described in other species and are likely to be revealed to be important for equine foetal health in the next couple of years.




What we have learned about umbilical cord torsion 




Dr DeMestre also spoke about umbilical cord torsion (UCT), which is the number one cause of abortion in the United Kingdom. “A recent study of a large population of mares in the UK and Ireland found for every 200 pregnant mares, there are three mares that lose a pregnancy due to UCT. The underlying cause of umbilical cord torsion is still being investigated, but its impact on foetal health and viability is likely related to the length of the amniotic portion of the umbilical cord and the degree of movement of the foetus between 100 and 200 days. In contrast, other causes of abortion are much less common with just three mares losing a pregnancy due to placentitis (infection of the placenta) for every 1,000 pregnant mares. A similar number of pregnancies are lost due to equine herpes virus infection and developmental defects of the foetus.




Genetics and late-term abortion




Whilst genetic causes of abortion are less common than during the early pregnancy period, they still contribute. Indeed, a single base pair change in DNA within the procollagen-lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase1 (PLOD1) gene leads to foals being born with extensive skin lesions due to abnormally thin and fragile skin, and other significant musculoskeletal abnormalities. A foal will only be affected by the disorder if it has two copies of the mutation, therefore it can be avoided with mating selection.”



Conclusion

The stallion talks really reminded us about what we can learn from nature and how we might be able to implement some management changes to improve reproductive behaviour in both the mare and stallion under domestic breeding conditions. Dr Love reminded us of the importance of good covering data and how monitoring both testicular size and dismount samples will help identify potential problems a stallion may encounter during the breeding season.




Dr Wolfsdorf highlighted the importance of a thorough clinical examination and diagnostic workup of any empty mares at the end of the season to ensure time to treat any issues and restore the reproductive tract so that barren mares enter the next breeding season in optimal condition. Dr Wolfsdorf also informed us of the options for monitoring and treating any high-risk pregnancies during later gestation to help improve live foaling rates.




Dr DeMestra’s work has highlighted the role of genetics in early pregnancy loss and the importance of the continued research being done on umbilical cord torsion as we still have more to learn about the number-one cause of late term pregnancy loss in the UK.

IF YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE - OR ORDER THE CONTENT FROM THIS ISSUE IN PRINT?

Conformation - factors for racing ability - what might increase the chances to pick a future star on the racecourse

Factors for Racing Ability and SustainabilityJudy Wardrope Everyone wants to be able to pick a future star on the track, ideally, one that can compete at the stakes level for several seasons. In order to increase the probability of finding such a ge…

By Judy Wardrope

Everyone wants to be able to pick a future star on the track, ideally, one that can compete at the stakes level for several seasons. In order to increase the probability of finding such a gem, many buyers and agents look at the pedigree of a horse and the abilities displayed by its relatives, but that is not always an accurate predictor of future success. When looking at a potential racehorse, the mechanical aspects of its conformation usually override the lineage, unless of course, the conformation actually matches the pedigree.

For our purposes, we will examine three horses at the end of their three-year-old campaigns and one at the end of her fourth year. In order to provide the best educational value, these four horses were chosen because they offer a reasonable measure of success or failure on the track, have attractive pedigrees and were all offered for sale as racing prospects in a November mixed sale. The fillies were also offered as broodmare prospects.

Is it possible to tell which ones were the better racehorses and predict the best distances for those who were successful? Do their race records match their pedigrees? Let’s see.

Horse #1

Horse #1

Horse #1

This gelding (photographed as a three-year-old) is by Horse of the Year Mineshaft and out of a daughter of Giants Causeway, a pedigree that would suggest ability at classic distances. He brought a final bid of $275k as a yearling and $45k as a maiden racing-prospect at the end of his three-year-old year after earning $19,150. His story did not end there, however. He went back to racing, changed trainers a few times, was claimed and then won a minor stakes at a mile while adding over $77k to his total earnings. All but one of his 18 races (3-3-3) were on the dirt, and he was still in training at the time of writing.

Structurally, he has some good points, but he is not built to be a superior athlete nor a consistent racehorse. His LS gap (just in front of the high point of croup) is considerably rearward from a line drawn from the top point of one hip to the top of the other. In other words, he was not particularly strong in the transmission and would likely show inconsistency because his back would likely spasm from his best efforts.

His stifle placement, based on the visible protrusion, is just below sheath level, which is in keeping with a horse preferring distances around eight or nine furlongs. However, his femur side (from point of buttock to stifle protrusion) of the rear triangle is shorter than the ilium side (point of hip to point of buttock), which not only adds stress to the hind legs, but it changes the ellipse of the rear stride and shortens the distance preference indicated by stifle placement. Horses with a shorter femur travel with their hocks behind them do not reach as far under their torsos as horses that are even on the ilium and femur sides. While the difference is not pronounced on this horse, it is discernable and would have an effect.

He exhibits three factors for lightness of the forehand: a distinct rise to the humerus (from elbow to point of shoulder), a high base of neck and a pillar of support (as indicated by a line extended through the naturally occurring groove in the forearm) that emerges well in front of the withers. The bottom of his pillar also emerges just into the rear quarter of his hoof, which, along with his lightness of the forehand, would aid with soundness for his forequarters.

The muscling at the top of his forearm extends over the elbow, which is a good indication that he is tight in the elbow on that side. He developed that muscle in that particular fashion because he has been using it as a brake to prevent the elbow from contacting the ribcage. (Note that the tightness of the elbow can vary from side to side on any horse.)

He ran according to his build, not his pedigree, and may well continue to run in that manner. He is more likely to have hind leg and back issues than foreleg issues.

Horse #2

Horse #2

Horse #2

This filly (photographed as a three-year-old) is by champion sprinter Speightstown and out of a graded-stakes-placed daughter of Hard Spun that was best at about a mile. The filly raced at two and three years of age, earning $26,075 with a lifetime record of 6 starts, one win, one second and one third—all at sprinting distances on the dirt. She did not meet her reserve price at the sale when she was three.

Unlike Horse #1, her LS gap is much nearer the line from hip to hip and well within athletic limits. But, like Horse #1, she is shorter on the femur side of her rear triangle, which means that although her stifle protrusion is well below sheath level, the resultant rear stride would be restricted, and she would be at risk for injury to the hind legs, particularly from hock down.

She only has two of three factors for lightness of the forehand: the top of the pillar emerges well in front of the withers, and she has a high point of neck. Unlike the rest of the horses, she does not have much rise from elbow to point of shoulder, which equates with more horse in front of the pillar as well as a slower, lower stride on the forehand. In addition, the muscling at the top of her forearm is placed directly over her elbow… even more so than on Horse #1. She would not want to use her full range of motion of the foreleg and would apply the brake/muscle she developed in order to lift the foreleg off the ground before the body had fully rotated over it to avoid the elbow/rib collision. This often results in a choppy stride. However, it should be noted that the bottom of her pillar emerges into the rear quarter of her hoof, which is a factor for soundness of the forelegs.

Her lower point of shoulder combined with her tight elbow would not make for an efficient stride of the forehand, and her shorter femur would not make for an efficient stride of the hindquarters.

Her construction explains why she performed better as a two-year-old than she did as a three-year-old. It is likely that the more she trained and ran, the more uncomfortable she became, and that she would favor either the hindquarters or the forequarters, or alternate between them.

She did not race nearly as well as her lineage would suggest.

Horse #3

Horse #3

Horse #3

This filly (photographed as a three-year-old) is by champion two-year-old, Midshipman, and out of a multiple stakes-producing daughter of Unbridled’s Song. She raced at two and three years of age and became a stakes-winner (Gr3) as a three-year-old, tallying over $425k in lifetime earnings from 12 starts. Although she did win one of her two starts on turf, she was best at 8 to 8.5 furlongs on the main track. She brought a bid of $775k at the sale and was headed to life as a broodmare.

Her LS gap is just slightly rearward of a line drawn from hip to hip and is therefore well within the athletic range. Her rear triangle is of equal distance on the ilium and femur sides, plus her stifle protrusion would be just below sheath level if she were male. She has the engine of an 8- to 9-furlong horse and the transmission to utilize that engine.

Aside from all three factors for lightness of the forehand (pillar emerging well in front of the withers, good rise of the humerus from elbow to point of shoulder and a high base of neck), the bottom of her pillar emerges into the rear quarter of her hoof to aid in soundness.

Although she shows muscle development at the top of her forearm, the muscling does not extend over her elbow the way it does on the previous two horses. Her near side does not exhibit the tell-tale muscle of a horse with a tight elbow, and thus, she would be comfortable using a full range of motion of the forehand.

Proportionately, she has the shortest neck of the sample horses, which may be one of the reasons she has developed the muscle at the top of her forearm. Since horses use their necks to aid in lifting the forehand and extending the stride, she may compensate by using the muscle over her humerus to assist in those purposes.

Of the sample horses, she is the closest to matching heritage and ability. …

CLICK HERE to return to issue contents.

BUY THIS ISSUE IN PRINT OR DOWNLOAD

Print / Online subscription
£26.95 every 12 months

4 x print issue and online subscription to European Trainer & online North American Trainer. Access to all digital back issues of both editions.

Your subscription will start with the January-March 2025 issue - published at the end of December.

If you wish to receive a copy of the most recent issue, please select this as an additional order.

Add to Cart

IF YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE - OR ORDER THE CONTENT FROM THIS ISSUE IN PRINT?

Conformation and Breeding Choices

Conformation and Breeding ChoicesJudy WardropeA lot of factors go into the making of a good racehorse, but everything starts with the right genetic combinations; and when it comes to genetics, little is black and white. The best we can do is to incr…

By Judy Wardrope

A lot of factors go into the making of a good racehorse, but everything starts with the right genetic combinations; and when it comes to genetics, little is black and white. The best we can do is to increase our odds of producing or selecting a potential racehorse. Examining the functional aspects of the mare and then selecting a stallion that suits her is another tool in the breeding arsenal.

For this article we will use photos of four broodmares and analyze the mares’ conformational points with regard to performance as well as matings likely to result in good racehorses from each one. We will look at qualities we might want to cement and qualities we might hope to improve for their offspring. In addition, we will look at their produce records to see what has or has not worked in the past.

In order to provide a balance between consistency and randomness, only mares that were grey (the least common color at the sale) with three or more offspring that were likely to have had a chance to race (at least three years old) were selected. In other words, the mares were not hand-picked to prove any particular point. 

All race and produce information was taken from the sales catalogue at the time the photos were taken (November 2018) and have not been updated. 

Slide1.jpg

Mare 1

Her lumbosacral gap (LS) (just in front of the high point of croup, and the equivalent of the horse’s transmission) is not ideal, but within athletic limits; however, it is an area one would hope to improve through stallion selection. One would want a stallion with proven athleticism and a history of siring good runners.

The rear triangle and stifle placement (just below sheath level if she were male) are those of a miler. A stallion with proven performance at between seven furlongs and a mile and an eighth would be preferable as it would be breeding like to like from a mechanical perspective rather than breeding a basketball star to a gymnast.

Her pillar of support emerges well in front of the withers for some lightness of the forehand but just behind the heel. One would look for a stallion with the bottom of the pillar emerging into the rear quarter of the hoof for improved soundness and longevity on the track. Her base of neck is well above her point of shoulder, adding additional lightness to the forehand, and she has ample room behind her elbow to maximise the range of motion of the forequarters. Although her humerus (elbow to point of shoulder) shows the length one would expect in order to match her rear stride, one would likely select a stallion with more rise from elbow to point of shoulder in order to add more lightness to the forehand.

Her sire was a champion sprinter as well as a successful sire, and her female family was that of stakes producers. She was a stakes-placed winner at six furlongs—a full-sister to a stakes winner at a mile as well as a half-sister to another stakes-winning miler. Her race career lasted from three to five.

She had four foals that met the criteria for selection; all by distance sires of the commercial variety. Two of her foals were unplaced and two were modest winners at the track. I strongly suspect that this mare’s produce record would have proven significantly better had she been bred to stallions that were sound milers or even sprinters.

Slide2.JPG

Mare 2 

Her LS placement, while not terrible, could use improvement; so one would seek a stallion that was stronger in this area and tended to pass on that trait. 

The hindquarters are those of a sprinter, with the stifle protrusion being parallel to where the bottom of the sheath would be. It is the highest of all the mares used in this comparison, and therefore would suggest a sprinter stallion for mating.

Her forehand shows traits for lightness and soundness: pillar emerging well in front of the withers and into the rear quarter of the hoof, a high point of shoulder plus a high base of neck. She also exhibits freedom of the elbow. These traits one would want to duplicate when making a choice of stallions.

However, her length of humerus would dictate a longer stride of the forehand than that of the hindquarters. This means that the mare would compensate by dwelling in the air on the short (rear) side, which is why she hollows her back and has developed considerable muscle on the underside of her neck. One would hope to find a stallion that was well matched fore and aft in hopes he would even out the stride of the foal.

Her sire was a graded-stakes-placed winner and sire of stakes winners, but not a leading sire. Her dam produced eight winners and three stakes winners of restricted races, including this mare and her full sister. 

She raced from three to five and had produced three foals that met the criteria for this article. One (by a classic-distance racehorse and leading sire) was a winner in Japan, one (by a stallion of distance lineage) was unplaced, and one (by a sprinter sire with only two starts) was a non-graded stakes-winner. In essence, her best foal was the one that was the product of a type-to-type mating for distance, despite the mare having been bred to commercial sires in the other two instances.

Mare 3 ….

BUY THIS ISSUE IN PRINT OR DOWNLOAD

January - March 2020, issue 68 (PRINT)
£8.95
Quantity:
Add to Cart

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE?

DON'T MISS OUT AND SUBSCRIBE TO RECEIVE THE NEXT FOUR ISSUES!

IF YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE - OR ORDER THE CONTENT FROM THIS ISSUE IN PRINT?

Osteochondrosis: genetic causes and early diagnosis

Osteochondrosis (OC) is a common lesion in young horses affecting the growing cartilage of the articular/epiphyseal complex of predisposed joints at specific predilection sites. In the young thoroughbred, it commonly affects the stifles, hocks, and …

By Prof. Celia M Marr

Osteochondrosis (OC) is a common lesion in young horses affecting the growing cartilage of the articular/epiphyseal complex of predisposed joints at specific predilection sites. In the young thoroughbred, it commonly affects the stifles, hocks, and fetlocks. As this condition has such important impact on soundness across many horse breeds, it is commonly discussed in Equine Veterinary Journal. Four recent articles covered causes of the disease, its genetic aspects, and a new and very practical approach to early diagnosis through ultrasound screening programmes on stud farms.

OC is a disease of joint cartilage. Cartilage covers the ends of bones in joints, and healthy cartilage is central to unrestricted joint movement. With OC, abnormal cartilage can be thickened, collapsed, or progress to cartilage flaps or osteochondral fragments separated from the subchondral bone leading to osteochondrosis dissecans (OCD). OC and OCD can be regarded as a spectrum rather than two discrete conditions.

Certain joints are prone to OC & OCD, and there is some variation between breeds on which joints have the highest prevalence.  In Australian thoroughbreds, 10% of yearlings had stifle OC, 8% had fetlock OC, and 6% had hock OC. The prevalence data may seem very high, but thoroughbred breeders may take some comfort in learning that similar, and indeed slightly higher prevalences, are reported in the warmblood breeds, standardbreds, and Scandinavian and French trotters. Heavy horse breeds have the highest prevalences.

In an article discussing progress in OC/OCD research, Professor Rene Van Weeren concludes that the clinical relevance of OC is man made.  In feral horses, where there is no human influence on mating pairings, OC does occur but at much lower prevalence than in horse breeds selected for sports or racing. Similarly, in pony breeds where factors other than speed and size are desirable characteristics, OC is also rare. These facts suggest that sports and racehorse breeders have inadvertently introduced a trait for OC along with other, desired traits. There is a strong link between height and OC, suggesting that one of the desired traits with unintended consequences is height. This is of particular relevance in sports horses: the Dutch warmblood has become taller at a rate of approximately 1 mm per year over the past decades, which might not seem much but it is still an inch in 25 years.  Van Weeren points out that if the two-hands tall Eohippus or Hyracotherium, the browsing forest-dweller with which equine evolution started some 65 millions of years ago, had evolved at this speed, the average horse would now have stood a staggering 40 miles at the withers.

TO READ MORE --

BUY THIS ISSUE IN PRINT OR DOWNLOAD -

July - September 2018, issue 62 (PRINT)
£8.95
Quantity:
Add to Cart

Why not subscribe?

Don't miss out and subscribe to receive the next four issues!

Focus on the Flat - Are commercial breeders targeting the right market?

Click on the cover to buy this back issue now!

First published in European Trainer issue 57 - April '17 - June '17

IF YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE - OR ORDER THE CONTENT FROM THIS ISSUE IN PRINT?

Paternal Age - the effects of a sire's age on progeny performance

CLICK ON THE IMAGE ABOVE TO READ ONLINE

First published in European Trainer issue 56 - January '17 - March '17

 

IF YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE - OR ORDER THE CONTENT FROM THIS ISSUE IN PRINT?

Shedding new light on breeding and broodmare management

CLICK ON IMAGE TO READ

Genetic testing - the benefits of creating a thoroughbred passport

CLICK ON IMAGE TO READ

In the genes - is racing success inherited?

IF YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE - OR ORDER THE CONTENT FROM THIS ISSUE IN PRINT?

Do mares improve when racing in foal?

 

CLICK ON IMAGE TO READ ARTICLE
(European Trainer - issue 33 - Spring 2011)

 

IF YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE - OR ORDER THE CONTENT FROM THIS ISSUE IN PRINT?