Justify & Jimson Weed - from the racetrack to the courtroom - positive test result for a banned substance on race day

/

By Peter J. Sacopulos

Justify, Jimson Weed & Justice: From the Racetrack to the Courtroom By Peter J. Sacopulos Justify’s victory in the 2018 Santa Anita Derby served as the springboard for trainer Bob Baffert’s second Triple Crown triumph. In the wake of a 2019 New York Times article revealing the colt had tested positive for a banned substance on race day, Ruis Racing has filed a lawsuit against the California Horse Racing Board. Ruis claims the CHRB failed to do its duty, and the 2018 victory and the $600,000 first-place purse rightfully belong to Bolt d’Oro.A Duel at Santa AnitaAs the starting bell sounded for the million-dollar Santa Anita Derby on April 7, 2018, folks who knew racing knew the contest was likely to come down to a duel between two horses: Bolt d’Oro and Justify. Both were big, beautiful and born to run. Bolt d’Oro, owned/trained by Mick Ruis and ridden by Javier Castellano, had experience on his side. Justify, trained by Bob Baffert, had only two races to his credit, but the handsome colt had won both and was already tagged as a rising star. A first- or second-place finish in Santa Anita would guarantee a spot in the Kentucky Derby, and Baffert, who had captured the Triple Crown with American Pharaoh only three years earlier, publicly hinted that his latest protégé could go all the way as well.Baffert’s confidence seemed well placed when Justify, ridden by Mike E. Smith, took an early lead. Having firmly established themselves in second place, Castellano and Bolt D’Oro made their move in the final turn. With announcer Mike Worna describing the match as “prodigious talent versus established class,” Bolt d’Oro closed the gap and appeared ready to nose it out. But Justify sprang ahead in the final furlong, and prodigious talent won the day in an electrifying climax.History in the MakingThe rest, as they say, is history. Bob Baffert and Justify kept their string of victories going through a muddy Kentucky Derby, a foggy, rain-soaked Preakness, and a beautiful day at Belmont. Justify became the thirteenth horse to win the Triple Crown, and Baffert decked his already legendary status with fresh laurels. The trainer had chalked up an astonishing two Triple Crowns, five Kentucky Derbies, seven Preakness Stakes, three Belmont Stakes and three Kentucky Oaks.Baffert had his eyes on The Grand Slam, but a problem with his superstar’s left front ankle led to the stallion’s retirement in late July 2018. Justify had earned $3,798,000 in six races. He followed Seattle Slew as the second winner in Triple Crown history to retire undefeated. Breeding rights were sold for a reported $60 million, plus a $25-million bonus for the Triple Crown triumph. Justify’s stud fee was reportedly set at $150,000.A Stunning Revelation & Angry AllegationsThen, last fall, a dark cloud appeared above the green pastures of Justify’s retirement. On September 11, 2019, The New York Times ran an article headlined, “Justify Failed a Drug Test Before Winning the Triple Crown.” Racing journalist Joe Drape revealed what the California Horse Racing Board and the horse’s trainer and owners had managed to keep secret for over a year. Justify had tested over the acceptable limit for scopolamine on the day of his crucial victory at Santa Anita.That would have been a bombshell in and of itself. But the article went on to detail a series of questionable actions by the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) in the aftermath of the positive test. Actions that, in the eyes of many, defied logic, violated procedure, and made mockery of ethics and transparency. Some even claimed the governing body had violated California law.Less than two weeks after the Times article appeared, California Governor Gavin Newsom publicly blasted the CHRB and the horse racing industry. “What happened last year was unacceptable, and all of the excuses be damned. We own that going into next season, and we’re going to have to do something about it,” Newsom told the Times. “I’ll tell you, talk about a sport whose time is up unless they reform. That’s horse racing,” the governor continued. He went on to excoriate the industry’s treatment of racehorses and warn that industries that don’t reform themselves get reformed by others.A Race Becomes a CaseIn January 2020, Ruis Racing, which owned and trained Bolt d’Oro, filed a lawsuit in the California courts. The suit contends that, under the California rules for Thoroughbred racing, Justify must be disqualified from the 2018 Santa Anita Derby, Bolt d’Oro must be recognized as the race’s rightful winner, and Ruis Racing must be awarded the first-place prize money. ($600,000 vs. their $200,000 second-place purse.) The suit also claims that the CHRB knowingly violated statutes and procedures, and that Ruis Racing is entitled to compensatory damages and reimbursement for all legal costs incurred by the suit.In the wake of the first Times article, Bob Baffert released a statement declaring that neither he nor his staff administered scopolamine to Justify prior to the Santa Anita run, or to any of his horses, ever. The statement said the substance had undoubtedly entered the horse’s system due to ingesting jimson weed—a natural source of scopolamine that can turn up in hay, straw and cereal grains. Baffert further stated that the CHRB had found no wrongdoing, that he had no influence over the Board or its decisions, and that Justify had tested clean in all of his other races.Getting into the WeedsBaffert’s statement correctly identified jimson weed as an environmental source of scopolamine. The chemical is a naturally occurring alkaloid found in noxious plants, including jimson weed. Invasive and aggressive, jimson weed is despised by farmers around the globe. Its defenses against nature’s plant-eaters include thorny seed pods, an unpleasant smell, and an extremely bitter flavor. Scopolamine not only contributes to the plant’s unappetizing taste, it adds toxicity. Though used in small amounts in human digestive remedies for centuries, modern medical experts consider jimson weed ineffective and unsafe, since ingesting the plant or its seeds can produce vomiting, seizures, muscle cramps and death. Its toxic effects extend to horses as well.While horses would likely avoid dining on jimson weed in natural surroundings, the plant is impossible to totally eradicate from modern farm fields, and small amounts of it occasionally turn up in horse feed, hay and straw. Horses that eat parts of the plant or its seeds will test positive for both scopolamine and atropine, another alkaloid found in jimson weed. The presence of both alkaloids in a horse’s blood or urine is typically taken as a sign of environmental contamination via jimson weed ingestion.The presence of scopolamine without atropine in test results would likely be evidence that a horse has been treated with Buscopan, a pharmaceutical approved by the FDA for the treatment of spasmodic colic in horses. This is because Buscopan contains a synthetic compound that is remarkably similar to scopolamine. In addition to relieving colic, the drug could also relax airways in the lungs, improving airflow. Buscopan’s labeling identifies increased heart rate as the drug’s major side effect.Science & SubstanceWhile scopolamine might theoretically increase racing performance, there is no scientific evidence indicating the alkaloid is an effective performance enhancer. As with many other substances, scopolamine is banned based on its theoretical potential, not real-world results.The New York Times piece that revealed Justify’s failed drug test reported a high level of scopolamine in the colt’s post-race urine sample: 300 ng/mml—well above the common industry thresholds of 60 or 75 ng/mml. The article never stated that Baffert or anyone on his staff had doped the horse. It did, however, include a disturbing quote regarding that high level from Dr. Rick Sams, who headed the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission’s drug laboratory for some seven years. “I think it has to come from intentional intervention,” Sams said.Many came to Baffert’s defense, including Tim Layden, who penned an article for NBCSports.com. Layden pointed out that Sams is a respected PhD and lab chief but is not a veterinarian, and that no vets’ or other experts’ opinions, some of which might well have contradicted Sams, were offered in the Times piece. Similar to an article I co-authored for The Horseman’s Journal, Layden outlined a case for environmental contamination at Santa Anita due to the presence of jimson weed in locally sourced hay and straw.The Environmental Contamination DefenseThe arguments for environmental contamination are hard to dismiss. Historically speaking, scopolamine positives have been few and far between. They often occur in clusters, which is an indicator of plant contamination. The Association of Racing Commissioners International (ARCI) recorded 28 positive scopolamine results over 30 years—22 of which occurred in California. Jimson weed thrives in the state, and its natural drought resistance makes it more likely to show up in feed when dry conditions reduce crop yields. In 2016, the CHRB officially warned industry professionals in Del Mar of the presence of jimson weed in straw.In 2018, Justify was one of six horses that tested positive for scopolamine in California around the time of the Santa Anita Derby, making feed contamination a likely culprit. All six animals also tested positive for atropine—a strong indicator that a plant, not a pharmaceutical, was the source of the compound.The presence of scopolamine at 300 ng/ml in Justify’s urine does seem high. But the presence of a substance in a urine sample indicates that it has been eliminated from the animal’s bloodstream by the kidneys. Properly functioning kidneys work to flush out as much of a natural or synthetic toxin as quickly as possible. Complicating matters, the level of a horse’s hydration and the acidity of its urine can also affect the levels of substances in its urine—all of which makes the measuring of substances in the blood a far more accurate indicator. As of this writing, the CHRB has not officially released Justify’s post-Santa-Anita test results. But multiple sources have reported that the level of scopolamine in Justify’s blood test was significantly lower.When it comes to Ruis Racing’s civil lawsuit, whether Justify accidentally nibbled on jimson-weed-tainted feed or was deliberately doped is strangely beside the point. After all, Ruis Racing isn’t suing Bob Baffert or Justify’s ownership group. Mick Ruis and his family are suing the California Horse Racing Board. And their case has the potential to shake American Thoroughbred racing to its core.What the CHRB Did & Didn’t DoThe following timeline chronicles CHRB’s actions during 2018 in light of Justify’s positive test for scopolamine. The timeline is based on press reports and information in the Ruis’ legal filing. Be aware that the CHRB’s refusal to publicly release all relevant information makes some dates and details impossible to pin down.On April 7, Justify won the Santa Anita Derby. Post-race samples were drawn from the horse for testing and sent to the official CHRB laboratory. On April 18, the lab reported the detection of scopolamine in Justify’s samples to the CHRB. CHRB rules required that both the organization’s executive director and medical director be notified.On April 20, the CHRB’s legal counsel, its chief investigator, and Executive Director Rick Baedeker received an email from CHRB Equine Medical Director Dr. Rick Arthur. The email noted that the Justify matter should be “handled differently than usual.”On April 26, Bob Baffert was notified of the test results and requested a split sample for independent testing. The split sample was sent to the lab on May 1. Justify won the Kentucky Derby on May 5. Three days later, on May 8, the split sample results confirmed the presence of scopolamine. CHRB Executive Director Baedeker informed Board members that, “The CHRB investigations unit will issue a complaint and a hearing will be scheduled.” (No complaint was issued, and no hearing was scheduled.)On May 19, Justify won the Preakness. On May 24, news of the horse’s breeding rights sale broke in The New York Times.At some point in May, the CHRB drafted revised drug classification rules, reducing the penalties for scopolamine. Under the proposed rules, what was a Class 3/Penalty B violation would become a Class 4/Penalty C violation. These changes would rescind requirements for disqualification and forfeiture of winnings.On June 9, Justify won the Belmont Stakes, clinching the Triple Crown.On a date in late August, the CHRB is believed to have held a closed or executive meeting to discuss the Justify situation. It appears that in the course of this meeting, Executive Director Rick Baedeker recommended the case be dismissed, and all those present voted to do so.In October, 2018, the CHRB’s revised rules for scopolamine officially took effect.Ruis Racing Weighs InThe Justify matter remained a well-kept secret until the Times published its exposé. In the months since, individuals who were members of the CHRB when Justify tested positive for scopolamine have spoken publicly about the matter. They have stated that an internal investigation determined that the scopolamine discovered in Justify’s urine was the result of accidental jimson weed ingestion, and the Board acted properly in allowing Justify to remain as the Santa Anita Derby winner while taking no further actions against Baffert or his horse. No harm, no foul. Mick Ruis and his attorneys disagree.The core of the Ruis Racing claim is that the CHRB failed in its mandatory duty by not following or enforcing its own rules, as required by California law. At the time of the 2018 Santa Anita Derby, California rules required a horse testing over the limit for scopolamine be disqualified, and any purse won be forfeited. Period.The Ruis suit claims that the CHRB did not apply the proper penalty at the time of the Santa Anita Derby, deviated from standard testing procedure, and failed to properly redistribute prize money after Justify’s positive scopolamine test. It also claims the CHRB failed in its mandatory duty, utilized a non-existent rule and an unofficial, illegal testing procedure, abused its powers of discretion, treated evidence in a selective manner, and applied a secret, unofficial standard. The lawsuit states that this amounts to arbitrary and capricious behavior by the Board, and that such behavior is biased, unacceptable and illegal, and violates Mick Ruis’ constitutional rights. There’s more, but you get the idea.Secrecy, Transparency & the Future of the SportYou may believe Justify accidentally ingested jimson weed in his feed and was vindicated by the CHRB. Or you may feel the CHRB played fast and loose to protect the record and reputation of a legendary trainer and his superstar horse. But no matter where you stand on the issue, it’s difficult not to be disheartened by the California Board’s lack of transparency in its processes and decisions regarding Justify’s scopolamine positive.As with all horse racing authorities in the U.S., the CHRB is supposed to enforce defined rules in a fair, consistent and uniform manner in order to protect horses, industry professionals, and above all, the public. It’s hard to see how the Board’s secrecy surrounding the Justify test results dovetails with that mission.Whatever the judge decides, Ruis Racing’s case will likely have deep, lasting ramifications for the horse racing industry. As the particulars play out in court, we would all do well to remember Governor Newsom’s warning to the racing industry and its regulators: “If you don’t reform yourself, you’re going to get run over and others are going to reform you in ways that you don’t like.” I could not have said it better myself. ####################

Justify’s victory in the  2018 Santa Anita Derby served as the springboard for trainer Bob Baffert’s second Triple Crown triumph. In the wake of a 2019 New York Times article revealing the colt had tested positive for a banned substance on race day, Ruis Racing has filed a lawsuit against the California Horse Racing Board. Ruis claims the CHRB failed to do its duty, and the 2018 victory and the $600,000 first-place purse rightfully belong to Bolt d’Oro.  

Justify with trainer Bob Baffert.

Justify with trainer Bob Baffert.

A Duel at Santa Anita

As the starting bell sounded for the million-dollar Santa Anita Derby on April 7, 2018, folks who knew racing knew the contest was likely to come down to a duel between two horses: Bolt d’Oro and Justify. Both were big, beautiful and born to run. Bolt d’Oro, owned/trained by Mick Ruis and ridden by Javier Castellano, had experience on his side. Justify, trained by Bob Baffert, had only two races to his credit, but the handsome colt had won both and was already tagged as a rising star. A first- or second-place finish in Santa Anita would guarantee a spot in the Kentucky Derby, and Baffert, who had captured the Triple Crown with American Pharaoh only three years earlier, publicly hinted that his latest protégé could go all the way as well. 

Baffert’s confidence seemed well placed when Justify, ridden by Mike E. Smith, took an early lead. Having firmly established themselves in second place, Castellano and Bolt D’Oro made their move in the final turn. With announcer Mike Worna describing the match as “prodigious talent versus established class,” Bolt d’Oro closed the gap and appeared ready to nose it out. But Justify sprang ahead in the final furlong, and prodigious talent won the day in an electrifying climax.

History in the Making

The rest, as they say, is history. Bob Baffert and Justify kept their string of victories going through a muddy Kentucky Derby, a foggy, rain-soaked Preakness, and a beautiful day at Belmont. Justify became the thirteenth horse to win the Triple Crown, and Baffert decked his already legendary status with fresh laurels. The trainer had chalked up an astonishing two Triple Crowns, five Kentucky Derbies, seven Preakness Stakes, three Belmont Stakes and three Kentucky Oaks. 

Baffert had his eyes on The Grand Slam, but a problem with his superstar’s left front ankle led to the stallion’s retirement in late July 2018. Justify had earned $3,798,000 in six races. He followed Seattle Slew as the second winner in Triple Crown history to retire undefeated. Breeding rights were sold for a reported $60 million, plus a $25-million bonus for the Triple Crown triumph. Justify’s stud fee was reportedly set at $150,000.

A Stunning Revelation & Angry Allegations

Then, last fall, a dark cloud appeared above the green pastures of Justify’s retirement. On September 11, 2019, The New York Times ran an article headlined, “Justify Failed a Drug Test Before Winning the Triple Crown.” Racing journalist Joe Drape revealed what the California Horse Racing Board and the horse’s trainer and owners had managed to keep secret for over a year. Justify had tested over the acceptable limit for scopolamine on the day of his crucial victory at Santa Anita.

That would have been a bombshell in and of itself. But the article went on to detail a series of questionable actions by the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) in the aftermath of the positive test. Actions that, in the eyes of many, defied logic, violated procedure, and made mockery of ethics and transparency. Some even claimed the governing body had violated California law.

Less than two weeks after the Times article appeared, California Governor Gavin Newsom publicly blasted the CHRB and the horse racing industry. “What happened last year was unacceptable, and all of the excuses be damned. We own that going into next season, and we’re going to have to do something about it,” Newsom told the Times. “I’ll tell you, talk about a sport whose time is up unless they reform. That’s horse racing,” the governor continued. He went on to excoriate the industry’s treatment of racehorses and warn that industries that don’t reform themselves get reformed by others.

A race becomes a case

Bolt d’Oro

Bolt d’Oro

In January 2020, Ruis Racing, which owned and trained Bolt d’Oro, filed a lawsuit in the California courts. The suit contends that, under the California rules for Thoroughbred racing, Justify must be disqualified from the 2018 Santa Anita Derby, Bolt d’Oro must be recognized as the race’s rightful winner, and Ruis Racing must be awarded the first-place prize money. ($600,000 vs. their $200,000 second-place purse.) The suit also claims that the CHRB knowingly violated statutes and procedures, and that Ruis Racing is entitled to compensatory damages and reimbursement for all legal costs incurred by the suit.

Trainer Bob Baffert is interviewed after winning the 2018 Santa Anita Derby.

Trainer Bob Baffert is interviewed after winning the 2018 Santa Anita Derby.

In the wake of the first Times article, Bob Baffert released a statement declaring that neither he nor his staff administered scopolamine to Justify prior to the Santa Anita run, or to any of his horses, ever. The statement said the substance had undoubtedly entered the horse’s system due to ingesting jimson weed—a natural source of scopolamine that can turn up in hay, straw and cereal grains. Baffert further stated that the CHRB had found no wrongdoing, that he had no influence over the Board or its decisions, and that Justify had tested clean in all of his other races.

Getting into the Weeds

Justify, ridden by Mike Smith, in the winners circle after winning the 2018 Santa Anita Derby.

Justify, ridden by Mike Smith, in the winners circle after winning the 2018 Santa Anita Derby.

Baffert’s statement correctly identified jimson weed as an environmental source of scopolamine. The chemical is a naturally occurring alkaloid found in noxious plants, including jimson weed. Invasive and aggressive, jimson weed is despised by farmers around the globe. Its defenses against nature’s plant-eaters include thorny seed pods, an unpleasant smell, and an extremely bitter flavor. Scopolamine not only contributes to the plant’s unappetizing taste, it adds toxicity. Though used in small amounts in human digestive remedies for centuries, modern medical experts consider jimson weed ineffective and unsafe, since ingesting the plant or its seeds can produce vomiting, seizures, muscle cramps and death. Its toxic effects extend to horses as well. …

CLICK HERE to return to issue contents

BUY THIS ISSUE IN PRINT OR DOWNLOAD

ISSUE 56 (PRINT)

$6.95



ISSUE 56 (DIGITAL)

$3.99


WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE?

DON'T MISS OUT AND SUBSCRIBE TO RECEIVE THE NEXT FOUR ISSUES!

Four issue subscription - PRINT & ONLINE - ONLY $24.95








Determining distance preferences

/

By Judy Wardrope

If we watch an international athletic track meet, we can easily discern structural differences in the athletes for various events. The body proportions differ (e.g., the shot putter has a much lower center of gravity than the high jumper). And, as we get more specific, we can even see that the sprinters differ from the middle-distance runners, who also differ from the long-distance runners. This is especially true at the upper level of sport. While all are built efficiently for their particular distance, those efficiencies differ from distance to distance.

We would not expect a marathon runner to win a sprint at the Olympics, would we? Why not? Likely because that marathon runner would be at a mechanical disadvantage for short distances no matter how athletic or how fit he or she was. Like humans, horses are best at the distances in which they are mechanically efficient. The more fitness a horse has, the better it will do, but horses, like humans, are always best at the distance that suits their underlying structure.

In this article we will look at horses that are built to run classic distances, horses that are built to be milers and horses that are built to sprint. We will not only examine them for distance preferences based on structure, we will also look at points for athleticism and soundness because those are also important factors in being a superior racehorse.

Justify

Although only started six times—all as a three-year-old—he was undefeated, earned $3,798,000 and won the Triple Crown. Many race fans were looking forward to him running in the Breeders’ Cup Classic, but that was not to be.

The 16.3+ hand stallion was photographed in November 2018 at Ashford Stud in Kentucky, where I was told that the injury that halted his race career was to his right hind fetlock.

He is an imposing figure, and it is obvious that he is built to specialize in classic distance races. His lumbosacral (LS) gap, which is just in front of the high point of croup, is bisected by a line drawn from the top of one hip to the top of the other. This means he was able to transfer his power upward and forward without undue strain on his back. In other words, he is strongly coupled or had a good transmission, which is a definite factor for athleticism.

The rear triangle is of equal length on the ilium side (from top of hip to point of buttock) and the femur side (point of buttock to stifle protrusion), meaning that his rear spring matched and did not impede the natural range of motion of the hind leg. And what gave him such a great range of motion? A stifle protrusion that is well below sheath level. His hind leg was capable of reaching well under him and extending well back through the natural range of motion, providing a ground-covering stride.

A line extend up and down through the naturally occurring groove in his forearm (a.k.a. the pillar of support) emerges well in front of his withers—a factor for lightness of the forehand—and into the rear quarter of his hoof—a factor for soundness.

Considering that all parts from the top of the scapula to the knee function as one apparatus, we can see that when the top of his scapula rotates back, his point of shoulder rises, his elbow comes forward and his forearm follows, giving him excellent reach through the forequarters. This means that both his hindquarters and his forequarters had matching ranges of motion. That equates with efficiency of stride.

The rise of the humerus from elbow to point of shoulder gave him another factor for lightness of the forehand, and a base of neck well above the resulting high point of shoulder added yet another factor for lightness.

From a structural perspective, he was designed to excel at classic distances and stay relatively sound. My only knock against him, and it is a purely personal one based on observation regarding longevity, is that I tend to avoid horses whose fetlocks have a roundish appearance.

California Chrome

He won the first two legs of the Triple Crown among other Gr1 wins and was third in the Breeders’ Cup Classic at three. He was second in the Dubai World Cup (Gr1) at four and won it at five, then was second in the Breeders’ Cup Classic that same year. His racing career ended after a lone start at six. His totals: 27 starts, 16 wins and $14,752,650 in earnings.

He was photographed at Santa Anita Park the day after the 2016 Classic as he was preparing to ship out, which is why his legs are wrapped.

Although most people may not see California Chrome as resembling Justify, when we examine the underlying structure, we find that the two horses are remarkably similar.

Both have an LS gap that is in line from hip to hip, both are equal on the ilium and femur sides of the rear triangle, both have similar stifle placement (classic distance), both have a pillar of support that goes with lightness and soundness, and both have a humerus of similar length as well as a base of neck well above the point of shoulder. There is a slight difference in the rise of the humerus, with Justify having a steeper rise from elbow to point of shoulder.

I Want Revenge

He won the Gotham Stakes (Gr3) by 8 ½ lengths in record time plus the Wood Memorial (Gr1) as a three-year-old and was angled towards the Kentucky Derby, where he was the morning-line favorite; but injury to the right front fetlock forced him out of work for over a year. His final start, as a six-year-old, was in an ungraded stakes race that saw him finish second. His best races were at distances just over a mile, and he earned $928,000 from 14 starts.

He was photographed at the Keeneland Sale in November 2018, shortly before his untimely death due to a virus.

His LS placement provided him with strength and athleticism, and like the previous two horses, he displayed equal length in the ilium and femur sides of the rear triangle. However, his stifle protrusion is not as low as either of the classic winners. The level is just below the bottom of his sheath, which equates with a slightly shorter range of motion and a slightly quicker stride rate.

TO READ MORE —

BUY THIS ISSUE IN PRINT OR DOWNLOAD -

Triple Crown 2019, issue 52 (PRINT)

$6.95

Triple Crown 2019, issue 52 (DOWNLOAD)

$3.99

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE?

DON'T MISS OUT AND SUBSCRIBE TO RECEIVE THE NEXT FOUR ISSUES!

Print & Online Subscription

From $24.95

/ /
, , , ,

Web Master

IF YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE - OR ORDER THE CONTENT FROM THIS ISSUE IN PRINT?

Rodolphe Brisset - The Frenchman making his mark on American racing

/

By Jessie Oswald

The calendar will show that Rodolphe Brisset passed the one-year mark as a trainer on April 1st, but he’s quickly making a name for himself with the success of Grade 2 Lambholm South Tampa Bay Derby winner Quip. Owned by WinStar Farm, China Horse Club, and SF Racing, the win put the Distorted Humor colt on the list for consideration for the spring classics and gave his young trainer his first graded stakes win.

“Winning that race was very rewarding and emotional, but you have to make sure you keep your feet on the ground, enjoy it for a day or two and then regroup and try to get another one,” said the humble Brisset.

Delve deeper into his record over his first year as a trainer and it becomes apparent that come the first Saturday in May, Brisset will have plenty to cheer about should either Justify or Noble Indy get their nose down in front on the wire.

Brisset may be most recognized as a former assistant trainer for Hall of Famer Bill Mott, but the French native has been working with and riding horses for much of his 34 years. Growing up in the countryside of Tours, France, Brisset and his sister spent weekends at the family vacation home about 30 miles from his parents’ restaurant and down the road from a horse ranch. With no family connection to horses, it was at the ranch that Brisset picked up the horse-riding bug, beginning lessons at age five. He took naturally to riding and progressed quickly.

“I think I was born to be on the racehorse,” Brisset joked from his base at Keeneland Racecourse in Lexington, Kentucky. “It’s really something that feels very natural for me. I’m more comfortable on the horse than on my feet.”

As Brisset’s aptitude for horses grew, he competed in cross-country and dressage and was at the ranch most every day, even helping break their young horses. By age 10 he was riding in France’s popular pony races. At 12, representatives from the esteemed AFASEC School in Chantilly, France, approached the pre-teen after his win in a pony race that was sandwiched between races on Chantilly’s regular racing card. His future was set. Brisset enrolled in the school at age 14 and attended for two years before riding his first professional race as a jockey at age 16, the earliest he could be licensed. But with his body still growing, a career as a jockey would not last long.

“It was fun,” recalled Brisset. “But from 18 to 21, it was tough, between the weight and maybe I started to mature and realize that I was not very good as a jockey, I just started to think about something else.”

With his dreams of being a jockey coming to an end, Brisset looked for other opportunities in the industry. Though he couldn’t ride in the afternoon races, his nearly 20 years of experience riding and working with horses made him an excellent exercise rider and horseman. Recognized for his talents on and off the racetrack, Brisset was offered a job with one of France’s leading trainers, Alain de Royer-Dupré, where he learned how to make the transition from jockey to assistant trainer.

“It was a big change for me,” said Brisset. “He’s a very detail-oriented person. He’s the one that gave me that passion about getting your horse ready to the point that you get the best out of them for the start. I started to get on some of the horses that were difficult in the morning and we tried to fix them. The turn for me between being a jockey and trainer. I spent time with him and it really made me realize that this was something maybe I would be, an assistant trainer, and, maybe at some point, train.”

TO READ MORE --

BUY THIS ISSUE IN PRINT OR DOWNLOAD -

August - October 2018, issue 49 (PRINT)

$5.95

August - October 2018, issue 49 (DOWNLOAD)

$3.99

Why not subscribe?

Don't miss out and subscribe to receive the next four issues!

Print & Online Subscription

$24.95

/ /
, , , , , ,

Web Master

IF YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE

WHY NOT SUBSCRIBE - OR ORDER THE CONTENT FROM THIS ISSUE IN PRINT?